Showing posts with label healthcare. Show all posts
Showing posts with label healthcare. Show all posts

Friday, March 30, 2012

Why Scalia's Broccoli Analogy Wasn't Stupid

Mostly because Scalia wasn't making an analogy - he was challenging the government to define a limiting principle.  If it is OK for the government to force someone to buy insurance at what point is it not OK for the government to force someone to buy something that it feels is important?


Scalia may have well have asked - if Congress thinks that forcing citizens to purchase yo-yos because Congress believes that every citizen owning yo-yos will prevent an invasion by little purple men from Alpha Centauri would that be Constitutional?  If it is not Constitutional what is the distinguishing difference between the two cases?

In other words - at what point is Congress prohibited from telling someone that they must buy something?  "Health care is special" is not a limiting principle because it opens the courts to infinite justifications around 'this market is special because:' type of arguments.  For example, yo-yos are special because of their unique place in prohibiting invasion by little-purple men from Alpha Centauri.


Wednesday, February 01, 2012

Please God No

I got an email from Consumer Reports today advocating tighter regulation of medical devices by the FDA.  Here is my response with a copy of the original email below:

This approach would simply raise the costs and increase the time associated with getting medical devices into the hands of the people that need them most.  We have already seen how the FDA approval process for drugs has slowed innovation and increased time to market by decades.  The last thing in the world that I want to see is this failed model super-imposed on medical devices.

_________________________________

Dear ,

It's a nightmare scenario. The implant that fixed your knee or your heart may actually be a ticking time bomb that could disable or kill you.

This isn't science fiction. Millions of medical devices including artificial hips, contact lens solution, heart stents, and pacemakers are being recalled - 700 different products a year.

And the vast majority of recalled products were never safety tested in humans, because the manufacturers claimed they were "similar" to products already on the market.

Tell Congress we don't want to be guinea pigs anymore!

Every new prescription drug must undergo rigorous testing on humans before it can be sold, even if it is similar to another drug already in use. Not so with medical devices. Because of this loophole in our safety laws, more than 90 percent of medical devices aren't safety tested before being sold nor are they routinely tracked afterwards to identify safety problems.

For example, a metal hip implant marketed by Johnson & Johnson was approved in 2005 without first undergoing clinical safety trials. It was recalled five years later after having a 1 in 8 failure rate in the UK, and releasing potentially toxic metals into the body. Countless patients had to undergo a second, painful 'revision' surgery.

It's time safety standards for medical devices are as strong as those for prescription drugs! E-mail your members now!

The device industry has unleashed an army of lobbyists and they don't want things to change. It will take a wave of consumers weighing in to make sure medical devices are safe and effective. Please take action, then forward this to friends and family. Thank you!

Sincerely,

Jim Guest
President, Consumer Reports
101 Truman Ave
Yonkers, NY 10703

Sunday, March 21, 2010

Healthcare Predictions

With ObamaCare ready to pass here are my predictions on what its effects will be:

  • Higher Insurance Premiums
  • 10s of millions of people still uninsured
  • It will cost more than initially claim leading to spiraling government debt
  • Zero change in the rate of change for life expectancy

I know the above will happen, I only suspect the following:

  • Decreased innovation (measured by fewer patents)
  • Medical clinics legislated into oblivion
  • Increased regulation: limiting competition for doctors, pharma and hospitals

Even with the above failures, proponents will demand more government interventions, failing to admit fault and rolling back their mistakes.

Anyone care to make a wager?

Technorati Tags: ,,