".... so he's trying to keep the definition of victory to be something he can meet." So says Mara Rudman, who was a deputy national security adviser under President Bill Clinton.
I have always been told in management training that setting attainable goals was a sign of good leadership. Would Democrats rather Bush give Americans unreasonable expectations so that he is easier to attack?
I’m no fan of Bush, but I wish that opponent would oppose him in meaningful ways instead of reinforcing the “anything that Bush does is wrong” view that make life way too easy for Conservatives.
In other words – I want a respectable opposition instead of the wingbat Democrats we are stuck with.